[XCSSA] MS POSIX Subsystem For WindowsNT--> Windows Services for UNIX Now = "Interix"
X-otic Computer Systems of San Antonio
xcssa at xcssa.org
Tue Aug 4 17:38:47 CDT 2009
I messed with Interix (called Subsystem for Unix-Based Applications at
the time) on Vista Ultimate (which you need to get SFUA anyway). It was
an interesting experience...
I can't think of any single thing that would make me recommend it over
Cygwin, other than the fact that you get the novelty of using a
Microsoft-issue POSIX environment. I've ported code to it for compile
testing, and it worked fine for that.
After I installed gperf from source
After I installed bison from source
After I installed cvs from source
... I think you see where I'm going with this. It was all the fun of
old, mid-90s slackware, with none of the reward of having a working
system at the end; after all, you're still on windows, and your *nix app
is still in a terminal window.
With that said, SFUA was the only way I was getting real NFS support in
Vista, and that I *don't* regret. The Vista NFS client is pretty damn
fast, even if it does suck at remembering to remount the shares on reboot :)
If I had to sum it up: Interix is pretty neat, but it's not worth the
headache to get it to a useful point if you're just tinkering.
-Sean
X-otic Computer Systems of San Antonio wrote:
> I thought that MS was killing off all the POSIX tools packages and support in
> 2010, but it looks like they're rebranding them yet again and including them
> as an optional environment in Windows 7 called Interix (v6.1).
>
> Check it out:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interix
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_Services_for_UNIX
>
> It's interesting that they're including so much GNU/GPL code. I mean with the
> hazards (the them) of it splitting open the status of Windows source code if
> ANYTHING ever gets "mixed in" to their non GPL side by accident.
>
> Q: Has anyone had any experience with using Interix and can compare/contrast
> it against say Cygwin? It seems that it's still missing some pretty major
> stuff: X11 server, vim (over just vi), OpenSSH, sudo, etc.
>
> I still don't understand why someone would use this over say Cygwin.
>
> Anyone?
>
> Tweeks
>
> _______________________________________________
> XCSSA mailing list
> XCSSA at xcssa.org
> http://xcssa.org/mailman/listinfo/xcssa
>
More information about the XCSSA
mailing list